top of page

What is quantum resistance and why should you care?

  • Writer: Digital Team
    Digital Team
  • Jun 14
  • 5 min read
Quantum resistance

What is quantum resistance and should you care about it?


As the digital age advances, so do the threats that accompany it. A new wave of security concern is emerging—not from hackers armed with powerful conventional computers, but from the approaching reality of quantum computing. These machines promise immense processing power and a fundamentally different way of performing calculations. But with that power comes a major risk: the ability to break the cryptographic systems that currently safeguard our data, communications, and digital infrastructure.


Quantum resistance refers to a new generation of cryptographic techniques designed to withstand attacks from quantum computers. These techniques—also known as post-quantum or quantum-safe cryptography—are being developed to ensure that the information we secure today cannot be compromised by the technologies of tomorrow. As the potential of quantum computing grows, so too does the urgency of adopting encryption methods that can survive its impact.


This article explores the importance of quantum resistance, focusing on its application in modern digital systems, the challenges involved in making the shift, and the opportunities it presents for governments, industries, and society at large.


Why quantum resistance is needed


Cryptography is embedded in nearly every digital interaction, from logging into email accounts and banking online to managing critical infrastructure and protecting state secrets. It forms the backbone of privacy and trust on the internet, primarily through two main types of algorithms: symmetric-key encryption and public-key encryption.


Symmetric-key methods scramble data using a secret key and are widely used for storing or transmitting sensitive information. Public-key encryption, by contrast, relies on two mathematically linked keys—one public, one private—to establish secure communications and verify identity. Both types are mathematically complex, and under current conditions, would take thousands of years for classical computers to break.


Quantum computers, however, operate on completely different principles. Instead of processing one calculation at a time, they can analyse many possibilities simultaneously. Using algorithms like Shor’s, quantum systems could swiftly solve mathematical problems that underpin today’s public-key cryptography, rendering it obsolete in the blink of an eye.


The consequences could be severe. If public-key systems are compromised, secure browsing, digital signatures, blockchain systems, and encrypted messaging could all become vulnerable. Worse, there are growing concerns that malicious actors may already be storing vast amounts of encrypted data, waiting for the day quantum machines are powerful enough to decrypt them—an approach often referred to as "harvest now, decrypt later."


Current state and implementation of quantum-resistant algorithms


Although today’s quantum machines do not yet possess the power to break mainstream encryption, efforts are already well underway to develop new defences. Researchers have been testing novel cryptographic algorithms designed to withstand quantum attacks. These post-quantum algorithms rely on mathematical structures different from those used in conventional encryption—such as lattice-based, multivariate polynomial, and hash-based techniques.


The challenge is not just inventing new encryption schemes but standardising and deploying them across the vast digital landscape. Rolling out quantum-resistant algorithms into existing systems—like email services, secure messaging platforms, cloud storage, and authentication systems—is no small feat. It involves rethinking digital certificates, updating protocols, and redesigning hardware in some cases.


One transitional approach involves hybrid encryption: combining post-quantum and traditional cryptographic methods to hedge against uncertainties. This ensures that if a post-quantum algorithm is found to be flawed, the classical algorithm still offers a layer of protection. While this approach provides added security during the transition, critics argue it increases complexity and may delay full adoption of new standards.


Notably, symmetric-key encryption is thought to be less vulnerable. Though quantum techniques such as Grover’s algorithm could reduce the time needed to break symmetric keys, simply doubling the key length offers an effective defence. This makes public-key cryptography the immediate concern and the primary focus of quantum-resistance development.


abstract picture

Challenges to wide-scale adoption


Despite progress, several obstacles stand in the way of widespread adoption of quantum-resistant cryptography. One major hurdle is time. Upgrading global digital infrastructure to use new cryptographic algorithms is not something that can be done overnight. In fact, for critical sectors like defence, finance, or healthcare, such changes may take years.


Another issue is uncertainty. While promising candidates for post-quantum cryptography are being vetted, there’s no guarantee that a future discovery won’t expose vulnerabilities in them. Unlike traditional algorithms, which have stood the test of time, these newer methods are still undergoing scrutiny. Trust must be earned, and that takes rigorous testing and industry-wide collaboration.


The practicalities of integration also present problems. Many existing systems are built around assumptions tied to classical cryptography, such as key lengths, processing speeds, and hardware design. Adapting to post-quantum methods may require significant system overhauls, creating friction for smaller organisations or under-resourced institutions.


Moreover, awareness remains an issue. Outside of academic and cybersecurity circles, many organisations and government bodies are unaware of the potential threat or believe it to be decades away. This perception could delay preparation and increase future vulnerability.


The opportunities ahead


The shift to quantum resistance is not just a defensive move—it also brings opportunities for innovation, resilience, and leadership. By transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards early, governments and industries can build trust in their digital services, safeguard sensitive data for the long term, and position themselves as global leaders in cyber resilience.


For technology developers, it opens up avenues for creating next-generation secure communications tools, authentication protocols, and digital identity systems. Financial institutions, healthcare providers, and infrastructure operators have the chance to future-proof their systems and avoid costly retrofits or crisis-driven upgrades.


In a broader sense, the focus on quantum resistance serves as a catalyst for strengthening overall cybersecurity practices. It encourages better key management, system audits, and architecture reviews—improvements that benefit organisations even before the quantum threat fully materialises.


There is also a strategic dimension. As geopolitical tensions and cyber warfare grow more sophisticated, the ability to protect information against tomorrow’s threats becomes a matter of national interest. Investing in quantum-safe technology today ensures a measure of sovereignty and self-determination in an increasingly unpredictable digital world.


Preparing for a post-quantum world


Quantum computing represents a major leap forward in processing power and computational capability. But it also presents one of the most significant threats to digital security in decades. While it’s unclear exactly when quantum machines will reach the point of being able to break existing encryption, the consensus is clear: the risk is real, and the time to prepare is now.


Developing and implementing quantum-resistant algorithms is not simply a technical exercise—it is a strategic necessity. Governments, businesses, and institutions must act deliberately to ensure that their data, systems, and services are secured against the quantum future.


Doing so will require investment, education, and international collaboration. But the result will be a safer, more resilient digital world—one that can continue to support innovation, privacy, and trust, even as quantum computing reshapes the technological landscape.



Quantum resistance

Comments


George James Consulting logo

Strategy – Innovation – Advice – ©2023 George James Consulting

bottom of page